Chassell vs Hancock
Chassell, Michigan versus Hancock, Michigan: a factual, side-by-side comparison of cost of living, housing, safety, schools, and climate. Greener figures rank better among US places.
Chassell and Hancock score about the same overall (54 vs 51 of 100) — the differences are in the individual factors below.
Factor-by-factor comparison
| Factor | Chassell | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Affordability | ||
| Median Household Income | $55k | $47k |
| Cost of Living | $46k | $46k |
| Home Value | $172k | $142k |
| Monthly Rent | $532 | $728 |
| Monthly Owner Costs | $295 | $928 |
| Property Tax Rate | 1.00% | 1.87% |
| Income Tax | 4.30% | 4.30% |
| Sales Tax | 6.00% | 6.00% |
| Estimated total tax burden | 9.41% | 11.91% |
| Unemployment | 0.0% | 2.5% |
| Weather | ||
| Winter Temp (Jan) | 17°F | 17°F |
| Summer Temp (Jul) | 65°F | 65°F |
| Annual Precipitation | 31.6 in | 31.6 in |
| Annual Snowfall | 207.8 in | 207.8 in |
| Sunny Days | 237 days | 237 days |
| Summer Humidity | 56°F | 56°F |
| Comfortable Days | 72 days | 72 days |
| Safety & Wellbeing | ||
| Natural Disaster Risk | 40.1 | 36.6 |
| School Quality | 49.2 | 49.5 |
| Violent Crime | 719/100k | 797/100k |
| Property Crime | 534/100k | 509/100k |
| Community | ||
| Population | 801 | 4,526 |
| Median Age | 46.1 | 29.5 |
| Racial Diversity | 0.16 | 0.11 |
| Male/Female Ratio | 0.90 | 1.16 |
| Political Leaning | R+14 | R+14 |
| White (%) | 91.5% | 94.1% |
| Black (%) | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Hispanic (%) | 5.4% | 1.0% |
| Asian (%) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Other / Multiracial (%) | 1.6% | 2.5% |
| Getting Around | ||
| Walkability | 7.7/20 | 8.6/20 |
| Airport Distance | 270 mi | 271 mi |
| Lifestyle & Connectivity | ||
| Broadband Access | 87.0% | 89.7% |
| Amenities Nearby | 37.45 | 167.92 |
| Park & Nature Access | Moderate | Moderate |
Each figure is colored by how it ranks among all US places: green is strong, amber average, red weaker. Neutral factors (population, demographics, target-style climate) show their percentile without a better/worse claim.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Chassell or Hancock more affordable?
- Hancock has the lower cost of living: its index is $46k, compared with Chassell's $46k and Hancock's $46k. Median rent is $532 in Chassell versus $728 in Hancock.
- Is Chassell or Hancock safer?
- Chassell has the lower violent crime rate. Chassell reports 719/100k and Hancock reports 797/100k (violent crimes per 100,000 residents).
- Are homes cheaper in Chassell or Hancock?
- The median home value is $172k in Chassell and $142k in Hancock, so homes are more affordable in Hancock.