Irvine vs Rancho Cucamonga
Irvine, California versus Rancho Cucamonga, California: a factual, side-by-side comparison of cost of living, housing, safety, schools, and climate. Greener figures rank better among US places.
Irvine edges out Rancho Cucamonga on overall objective livability (47 vs 42 of 100), though each leads on different factors below.
Factor-by-factor comparison
| Factor | Irvine | Rancho Cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| Affordability | ||
| Median Household Income | $123k | $106k |
| Cost of Living | $83k | $83k |
| Home Value | $1.0M | $657k |
| Monthly Rent | $3k | $2k |
| Monthly Owner Costs | $4k | $3k |
| Property Tax Rate | 0.85% | 0.73% |
| Income Tax | 13.30% | 13.30% |
| Sales Tax | 8.85% | 8.85% |
| Estimated total tax burden | 23.28% | 20.76% |
| Unemployment | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Weather | ||
| Winter Temp (Jan) | 57°F | 56°F |
| Summer Temp (Jul) | 74°F | 79°F |
| Annual Precipitation | 14.1 in | 17.2 in |
| Annual Snowfall | 0.0 in | 0.0 in |
| Sunny Days | 277 days | 277 days |
| Summer Humidity | 55°F | 55°F |
| Comfortable Days | 277 days | 148 days |
| Safety & Wellbeing | ||
| Natural Disaster Risk | 85.8 | 94.5 |
| Air Quality | 45 AQI | 54 AQI |
| School Quality | 56.2 | 71.9 |
| Violent Crime | 434/100k | 703/100k |
| Property Crime | 1614/100k | 2018/100k |
| Community | ||
| Population | 304,527 | 174,696 |
| Median Age | 33.8 | 37.5 |
| Racial Diversity | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| Male/Female Ratio | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| Political Leaning | Even | Even |
| White (%) | 35.7% | 33.0% |
| Black (%) | 1.7% | 8.6% |
| Hispanic (%) | 11.2% | 39.5% |
| Asian (%) | 44.1% | 14.1% |
| Other / Multiracial (%) | 7.2% | 4.8% |
| Getting Around | ||
| Commute Time | 24 min | 33 min |
| Walkability | 14.0/20 | 13.5/20 |
| Airport Distance | 6 mi | 36 mi |
| Lifestyle & Connectivity | ||
| Broadband Access | 95.3% | 94.3% |
| Amenities Nearby | 28.90 | 19.81 |
| Park & Nature Access | Limited | Moderate |
Each figure is colored by how it ranks among all US places: green is strong, amber average, red weaker. Neutral factors (population, demographics, target-style climate) show their percentile without a better/worse claim.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Irvine or Rancho Cucamonga more affordable?
- Rancho Cucamonga has the lower cost of living: its index is $83k, compared with Irvine's $83k and Rancho Cucamonga's $83k. Median rent is $3k in Irvine versus $2k in Rancho Cucamonga.
- Is Irvine or Rancho Cucamonga safer?
- Irvine has the lower violent crime rate. Irvine reports 434/100k and Rancho Cucamonga reports 703/100k (violent crimes per 100,000 residents).
- Are homes cheaper in Irvine or Rancho Cucamonga?
- The median home value is $1.0M in Irvine and $657k in Rancho Cucamonga, so homes are more affordable in Rancho Cucamonga.