Leominster vs Worcester
Leominster, Massachusetts versus Worcester, Massachusetts: a factual, side-by-side comparison of cost of living, housing, safety, schools, and climate. Greener figures rank better among US places.
Leominster and Worcester score about the same overall (47 vs 44 of 100) — the differences are in the individual factors below.
Factor-by-factor comparison
| Factor | Leominster | Worcester |
|---|---|---|
| Affordability | ||
| Median Household Income | $76k | $63k |
| Cost of Living | $58k | $58k |
| Home Value | $323k | $306k |
| Monthly Rent | $1k | $1k |
| Monthly Owner Costs | $2k | $2k |
| Property Tax Rate | 1.52% | 1.43% |
| Income Tax | 9.00% | 9.00% |
| Sales Tax | 6.25% | 6.25% |
| Estimated total tax burden | 17.55% | 17.99% |
| Unemployment | 6.0% | 6.6% |
| Weather | ||
| Winter Temp (Jan) | 25°F | 25°F |
| Summer Temp (Jul) | 72°F | 71°F |
| Annual Precipitation | 43.4 in | 48.3 in |
| Annual Snowfall | 75.2 in | 72.9 in |
| Sunny Days | 230 days | 181 days |
| Summer Humidity | 60°F | 62°F |
| Comfortable Days | 86 days | 91 days |
| Safety & Wellbeing | ||
| Natural Disaster Risk | 32.1 | 33.1 |
| Air Quality | 41 AQI | 41 AQI |
| School Quality | 78.3 | 100.0 |
| Violent Crime | 1506/100k | 1622/100k |
| Property Crime | 1433/100k | 1668/100k |
| Community | ||
| Population | 43,620 | 204,191 |
| Median Age | 43.0 | 34.3 |
| Racial Diversity | 0.40 | 0.58 |
| Male/Female Ratio | 1.04 | 0.99 |
| Political Leaning | D+18 | D+18 |
| White (%) | 70.8% | 51.8% |
| Black (%) | 5.9% | 11.9% |
| Hispanic (%) | 13.9% | 24.6% |
| Asian (%) | 3.0% | 6.8% |
| Other / Multiracial (%) | 6.4% | 5.0% |
| Getting Around | ||
| Commute Time | 28 min | 24 min |
| Walkability | 12.2/20 | 15.9/20 |
| Airport Distance | 40 mi | 41 mi |
| Lifestyle & Connectivity | ||
| Broadband Access | 91.7% | 87.5% |
| Amenities Nearby | 47.00 | 17.78 |
| Park & Nature Access | Good | Moderate |
Each figure is colored by how it ranks among all US places: green is strong, amber average, red weaker. Neutral factors (population, demographics, target-style climate) show their percentile without a better/worse claim.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Leominster or Worcester more affordable?
- Worcester has the lower cost of living: its index is $58k, compared with Leominster's $58k and Worcester's $58k. Median rent is $1k in Leominster versus $1k in Worcester.
- Is Leominster or Worcester safer?
- Leominster has the lower violent crime rate. Leominster reports 1506/100k and Worcester reports 1622/100k (violent crimes per 100,000 residents).
- Are homes cheaper in Leominster or Worcester?
- The median home value is $323k in Leominster and $306k in Worcester, so homes are more affordable in Worcester.