Clinton vs Fort Washington
Clinton, Maryland versus Fort Washington, Maryland: a factual, side-by-side comparison of cost of living, housing, safety, schools, and climate. Greener figures rank better among US places.
Clinton and Fort Washington score about the same overall (40 vs 42 of 100) — the differences are in the individual factors below.
Factor-by-factor comparison
| Factor | Clinton | Fort Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Affordability | ||
| Median Household Income | $122k | $144k |
| Cost of Living | $66k | $71k |
| Home Value | $379k | $444k |
| Monthly Rent | $2k | $3k |
| Monthly Owner Costs | $2k | $3k |
| Property Tax Rate | 1.20% | 1.11% |
| Income Tax | 9.00% | 5.80% |
| Sales Tax | 6.00% | 6.00% |
| Estimated total tax burden | 14.70% | 11.21% |
| Unemployment | 5.7% | 6.0% |
| Weather | ||
| Winter Temp (Jan) | 37°F | 37°F |
| Summer Temp (Jul) | 80°F | 80°F |
| Annual Precipitation | 46.5 in | 46.8 in |
| Annual Snowfall | 13.7 in | 13.4 in |
| Sunny Days | 222 days | 165 days |
| Summer Humidity | 66°F | 66°F |
| Comfortable Days | 79 days | 79 days |
| Safety & Wellbeing | ||
| Natural Disaster Risk | 15.7 | 11.8 |
| Air Quality | 50 AQI | 53 AQI |
| School Quality | 83.8 | 83.8 |
| Violent Crime | 642/100k | 1396/100k |
| Property Crime | 1973/100k | 1961/100k |
| Community | ||
| Population | 40,224 | 25,825 |
| Median Age | 44.5 | 44.1 |
| Racial Diversity | 0.38 | 0.58 |
| Male/Female Ratio | 0.97 | 0.96 |
| Political Leaning | D+82 | D+64 |
| White (%) | 7.0% | 11.4% |
| Black (%) | 76.8% | 60.7% |
| Hispanic (%) | 9.7% | 16.8% |
| Asian (%) | 2.1% | 7.5% |
| Other / Multiracial (%) | 4.4% | 3.6% |
| Getting Around | ||
| Commute Time | 38 min | 42 min |
| Walkability | 5.6/20 | 11.0/20 |
| Airport Distance | 10 mi | 8 mi |
| Lifestyle & Connectivity | ||
| Broadband Access | 92.5% | 94.8% |
| Amenities Nearby | 19.14 | 96.81 |
| Park & Nature Access | Moderate | Moderate |
Each figure is colored by how it ranks among all US places: green is strong, amber average, red weaker. Neutral factors (population, demographics, target-style climate) show their percentile without a better/worse claim.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Clinton or Fort Washington more affordable?
- Clinton has the lower cost of living: its index is $66k, compared with Clinton's $66k and Fort Washington's $71k. Median rent is $2k in Clinton versus $3k in Fort Washington.
- Is Clinton or Fort Washington safer?
- Clinton has the lower violent crime rate. Clinton reports 642/100k and Fort Washington reports 1396/100k (violent crimes per 100,000 residents).
- Are homes cheaper in Clinton or Fort Washington?
- The median home value is $379k in Clinton and $444k in Fort Washington, so homes are more affordable in Clinton.