Rosenberg vs Sugar Land
Rosenberg, Texas versus Sugar Land, Texas: a factual, side-by-side comparison of cost of living, housing, safety, schools, and climate. Greener figures rank better among US places.
Rosenberg and Sugar Land score about the same overall (45 vs 47 of 100) — the differences are in the individual factors below.
Factor-by-factor comparison
| Factor | Rosenberg | Sugar Land |
|---|---|---|
| Affordability | ||
| Median Household Income | $66k | $132k |
| Cost of Living | $60k | $60k |
| Home Value | $208k | $388k |
| Monthly Rent | $1k | $2k |
| Monthly Owner Costs | $2k | $3k |
| Property Tax Rate | 1.62% | 1.82% |
| Income Tax | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sales Tax | 8.20% | 8.20% |
| Estimated total tax burden | 7.82% | 8.04% |
| Unemployment | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Weather | ||
| Winter Temp (Jan) | 55°F | 55°F |
| Summer Temp (Jul) | 85°F | 85°F |
| Annual Precipitation | 51.1 in | 54.2 in |
| Annual Snowfall | 0.0 in | 0.0 in |
| Sunny Days | 192 days | 192 days |
| Summer Humidity | 73°F | 73°F |
| Comfortable Days | 127 days | 125 days |
| Safety & Wellbeing | ||
| Natural Disaster Risk | 78.0 | 70.9 |
| Air Quality | 42 AQI | 42 AQI |
| School Quality | 51.6 | 47.1 |
| Violent Crime | 2009/100k | 450/100k |
| Property Crime | 1720/100k | 1622/100k |
| Community | ||
| Population | 38,722 | 110,077 |
| Median Age | 31.2 | 42.5 |
| Racial Diversity | 0.72 | 0.64 |
| Male/Female Ratio | 0.94 | 0.97 |
| Political Leaning | D+11 | D+11 |
| White (%) | 18.9% | 37.8% |
| Black (%) | 13.4% | 7.2% |
| Hispanic (%) | 57.8% | 13.0% |
| Asian (%) | 9.0% | 38.0% |
| Other / Multiracial (%) | 1.0% | 4.0% |
| Getting Around | ||
| Commute Time | 28 min | 30 min |
| Walkability | 8.0/20 | 9.9/20 |
| Airport Distance | 34 mi | 22 mi |
| Lifestyle & Connectivity | ||
| Broadband Access | 81.8% | 97.0% |
| Amenities Nearby | 12.14 | 24.35 |
| Park & Nature Access | Good | Moderate |
Each figure is colored by how it ranks among all US places: green is strong, amber average, red weaker. Neutral factors (population, demographics, target-style climate) show their percentile without a better/worse claim.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Rosenberg or Sugar Land more affordable?
- Sugar Land has the lower cost of living: its index is $60k, compared with Rosenberg's $60k and Sugar Land's $60k. Median rent is $1k in Rosenberg versus $2k in Sugar Land.
- Is Rosenberg or Sugar Land safer?
- Sugar Land has the lower violent crime rate. Rosenberg reports 2009/100k and Sugar Land reports 450/100k (violent crimes per 100,000 residents).
- Are homes cheaper in Rosenberg or Sugar Land?
- The median home value is $208k in Rosenberg and $388k in Sugar Land, so homes are more affordable in Rosenberg.